Real-life retrospective observational study to determine the prevalence and economic burden of severe asthma in Spain.

Objective: We determined the percentage of patients with severe asthma and exacerbations and evaluated the costs of the disease based on blood eosinophil counts.Methods: A retrospective observational study based on the review of medical records in Spain was carried out. Patients ≥18 years of age requiring care during the years 2014-2015; diagnosed with asthma with at least 2 years of continuous records (at least one year prior to the index date defined as the first asthma medication prescription and at least one year after the index date) were included. Study groups: eosinophil counts <300 cells/µl and ≥300 cells/µl. Main variables: comorbidity, clinical parameters, exacerbations and annual asthma total costs.Results: A total of 268 severe asthmatic patients in Spain were included, representing 6.3% of the asthma population, with 58.6% having eosinophil count ≥300 cells/µl and 41.4% eosinophil count <300 cells/µl. The mean age was 56.1 years (63.4% women). Patients with eosinophilic inflammation (≥300 cells/µl) had lower FEV1 values (54.3% vs. 60.7%; p < .001), poorer treatment adherence (65.6% vs. 77.3%; p < .001), and a greater mean number of exacerbations (3.3 vs. 1.9; p < .001). Exacerbations were correlated to FEV1 (ß=‒.606), eosinophils (ß = .255), immunoglobulin E (ß = .152), and age (ß = .128), p < .001. The mean total asthma annual cost (ANCOVA) was 6222 vs. 4152 euros, respectively (p = .016). Health costs were associated with age (ß = .323), FEV1 (ß = .239), eosinophils (ß = .177) and exacerbations (ß = .158), p < .01.Limitations: Those inherent to retrospective studies; the possible inaccuracy of diagnostic coding referring to severe asthma and other comorbidities and the external validity of the results.Conclusions: Health costs of patients with severe asthma were high. Total annual asthma costs and resource use were greater in patients with ≥300 cells/µl. Age, eosinophilia, exacerbations and FEV1 were associated with greater resource utilization and costs for the health system.

Severe Atopic Dermatitis In Spain: A Real-Life Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the epidemiology and characterize the treatment prescribed for severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in children/adults in usual clinical practice. METHODS: Observational, retrospective study made through review of medical records of Spanish patients aged ≥6 years. Patients diagnosed with severe AD who required care between 2013 and 2017 were included. The study groups were: 6-12 years; 13-18 years; and > 18 years. Patients were followed for 5 years. The main measurements were the prevalence of AD, comorbidity and treatment duration. Statistical significance was established as p <0.05. RESULTS: We included 2323 patients with severe AD. The overall prevalence was 0.10% (95% CI: 0.09-0.11%) and was 0.39%, 0.23% and 0.07% in the 6-12 years, 13-18 years and >18 years age groups, respectively (p <0.001), the percentage of males was 58%, 48.6% and 39%, respectively, and general comorbidity was 0.1, 0.2 and 0.9 points, respectively (p <0.001).The most frequent comorbidities were asthma in 49.0%, 44.9% and 20.8%, respectively (p <0.001), and anxiety in 79.7%, 65.8% and 67.3%, respectively (p <0.001). Oral corticosteroids were administered in 97.3%, 90.9% and 81.7%, respectively (concomitant-medication). Cyclosporine (45.3%), azathioprine (15.9%) and methotrexate (9.0%) were the most frequently prescribed drugs; biologic agents were administered in 5.8% of patients (for AD). CONCLUSION: In AD the presence of comorbidities was significant, especially in the psychological, immunoallergic and cardiovascular areas. Cyclosporine was the most widely used immunosuppressant. There was a degree of variability in the use and duration of the treatments prescribed.

Economic impact of delaying initiation with multiple-inhaler maintenance triple therapy in Spanish patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Purpose: Guidelines recommend the use of triple therapy with an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), a long-acting ß2 agonist (LABA) and a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) to reduce the risk of future exacerbations in symptomatic COPD patients with a history of exacerbations. This study aimed to estimate COPD-related healthcare resource use and costs, and subsequent exacerbation rates, for patients initiating multiple-inhaler triple therapy (MITT) early (≤30 days) versus late (31-180 days) following an exacerbation, in a real-world clinical setting. Patients and methods: This was an observational, longitudinal, retrospective study using electronic medical records from the Spanish database of the Red de Investigación en Servicios Sanitarios Foundation. Patients ≥40 years old with a confirmed COPD diagnosis who were newly prescribed MITT up to 180 days after an exacerbation between January 2013 and December 2015 were included. Patients were followed from the date of MITT initiation for up to 12 months to assess COPD-related health care resource use (routine and emergency visits, hospitalizations, pharmacologic treatment), exacerbation rate, and costs (€2017); these endpoints were compared between early versus late groups. Results: The study included 1280 patients who met selection criteria: mean age 73 years, 78% male, and 41% had severe/very severe lung function impairment. The proportion of patients initiating MITT early versus late was 61.6% versus 38.4%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics between groups. During follow-up, health care resource consumption was lower in the early versus late group, especially primary care and ED visits, leading to lower total costs (€1861 versus €1935; P<0.05). In the follow-up period, 28.0% of the patients in the early group experienced ≥1 exacerbation versus 36.4% in the late group (P=0.002), with an exacerbation rate of 0.5 versus 0.6 per person per year (P=0.022), respectively. Conclusion: Initiating MITT early (≤30 days after an exacerbation) may reduce health care costs and exacerbation rate compared with late MITT initiation.

Prevalencia de las potenciales interacciones medicamentosas entre los antivirales de acción directa pangenotípicos y la medicación concomitante asociada a los pacientes con infección del virus de la hepatitis C crónica en España / Prevalence of the potential drug-drug interactions between pangenotypic direct-acting antivirals and the concomitant medications associated with patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection in Spain

Objetivo: Determinar la comorbilidad y las potenciales interacciones-farmacológicas (IFs) entre los antivirales de acción-directa pangenotípicos (AADp) y la medicación-concomitante asociada a los pacientes con hepatitis C crónica (HCC) en práctica clínica habitual en España. Métodos: Diseño observacional retrospectivo. Se incluyeron pacientes ≥18 años con diagnóstico de HCC, en tratamiento antiviral y visitados durante el año 2017. Se diferenciaron 2 grupos en función de la edad (<50 y ≥50 años). Las variables recogidas fueron: edad, género, comorbilidad general/específica, medicación-concomitante y potenciales IFs (www.hep-druginteractions.org). Los AADp analizados fueron: a) sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL); b) glecaprevir/pibrentasvir; y c) sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX). Análisis-estadístico bivariante: p<0,05. Resultados: Se reclutaron 3.430 pacientes, edad-media de 56,9 años y el 60,3% varones. El promedio del índice Charlson fue 0,8 puntos. Distribución por rangos de edad: 18-49 (28,9%) y ≥50 años (71,1%). El promedio de medicamentos fue: 3,1 (DE: 2,6) por paciente. El porcentaje total de potenciales IFs fue: 8,6% débil, 40,5% clínicamente significativas y 10,0% medicación contraindicada. Estas interacciones fueron mayores en los pacientes ≥50 años (8,6%; 43,8% y 12,4%, respectivamente, p<0,001). Para todas las edades SOF/VEL en comparación con glecaprevir/pibrentasvir y SOF/VEL/VOX presentó un menor porcentaje de interacciones-débiles (1,3% vs. 6,6% y 5,9%, p<0,001); interacciones clínicamente-significativas (53,4%, vs. 77,4% y 66,3%, p<0,001) y medicación-contraindicada (1,7% vs. 8,3% y 10,7%, p<0,001). Conclusiones: Los sujetos con HCC presentan una elevada comorbilidad y consumo de medicación concomitante, especialmente en pacientes mayores, circunstancia que repercute en una mayor exposición a potenciales IFs. Aunque la tasa de IFs fue considerable con las 3 combinaciones analizadas, SOF/VEL mostró una menor proporción clínicamente relevante

Objective: To determine the comorbidity and potential for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) among pangenotypic direct-acting-antivirals (pDAAs) and the concomitant medications associated with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients in routine clinical practice in Spain. Methods: Retrospective observational study. Included patients were ≥18 years, diagnosed with CHC, on antiviral treatment and required medical attention during 2017. Two groups were differentiated according to age ranges (<50 and ≥50 years). The variables collected were: age, gender, general/specific comorbidity, concomitant medication and potential DDIs (www.hep-druginteractions.org). The pDAAs analysed were: a) Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir (SOF/VEL), b) Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) and c) Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir/Voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX). Bivariate statistical analysis, P<.05. Results: 3,430 patients with a mean age of 56.9 years and 60.3% males were enrolled. The average Charlson index was 0.8. Age range distribution: 18-49 years (28.9%) and ≥50 years (71.1%). The average number of medications per patient/year was 3.1 (SD 2.6). The total percentage of potential DDIs was: 8.6% minor DDIs, 40.5% clinically significant DDIs and 10.0% contraindicated medication. These DDIs were greater in patients ≥50 years (8.6%, 43.8% and 12.4%, respectively, P<.001). For all ages, SOF/VEL showed a lower percentage of: minor interactions (1.3% vs. 6.6% and 5.9%, P<.001); clinically significant interactions (53.4%, vs. 77.4% and 66.3%, P<.001) and contraindicated medication (1.7% vs. 8.3% and 10.7%, P<.001) compared to GLE/PIB and SOF/VEL/VOX, respectively. Conclusions: Patients with CHC present high comorbidity and concomitant medication use, particularly elderly patients, thus implying a greater exposure to potential DDIs. Although the DDI rate was considerable with the three combinations analysed, SOF/VEL showed a lower number of clinically significant interactions

Prevalence of the potential drug-drug interactions between pangenotypic direct-acting antivirals and the concomitant medications associated with patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection in Spain. / Prevalencia de las potenciales interacciones medicamentosas entre los antivirales de acción directa pangenotípicos y la medicación concomitante asociada a los pacientes con infección del virus de la hepatitis C crónica en España.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the comorbidity and potential for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) among pangenotypic direct-acting-antivirals (pDAAs) and the concomitant medications associated with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients in routine clinical practice in Spain. METHODS: Retrospective observational study. Included patients were ≥18 years, diagnosed with CHC, on antiviral treatment and required medical attention during 2017. Two groups were differentiated according to age ranges (<50 and ≥50 years). The variables collected were: age, gender, general/specific comorbidity, concomitant medication and potential DDIs (www.hep-druginteractions.org). The pDAAs analysed were: a) Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir (SOF/VEL), b) Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) and c) Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir/Voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX). Bivariate statistical analysis, P<.05. RESULTS: 3,430 patients with a mean age of 56.9 years and 60.3% males were enrolled. The average Charlson index was 0.8. Age range distribution: 18-49 years (28.9%) and ≥50 years (71.1%). The average number of medications per patient/year was 3.1 (SD 2.6). The total percentage of potential DDIs was: 8.6% minor DDIs, 40.5% clinically significant DDIs and 10.0% contraindicated medication. These DDIs were greater in patients ≥50 years (8.6%, 43.8% and 12.4%, respectively, P<.001). For all ages, SOF/VEL showed a lower percentage of: minor interactions (1.3% vs. 6.6% and 5.9%, P<.001); clinically significant interactions (53.4%, vs. 77.4% and 66.3%, P<.001) and contraindicated medication (1.7% vs. 8.3% and 10.7%, P<.001) compared to GLE/PIB and SOF/VEL/VOX, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CHC present high comorbidity and concomitant medication use, particularly elderly patients, thus implying a greater exposure to potential DDIs. Although the DDI rate was considerable with the three combinations analysed, SOF/VEL showed a lower number of clinically significant interactions.

Consequences on economic outcomes of generic versus brand-name drugs used in routine clinical practice: the case of treating peripheral neuropathic pain or generalized anxiety disorder with pregabalin.

BACKGROUND: Discrepancies are seen between arguments in favor of and against prescribing generic versus brand-name drugs. OBJECTIVE: To provide real-world evidence on treatment persistence, economic and clinical outcomes of pregabalin, generic versus brand-name (Lyrica®, Pfizer), routinely used to treat neuropathic pain (NP) or generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). METHODS: Electronic medical records from subjects' first starting treatment with pregabalin between January-2015 and June-2016 were analyzed. Persistence, resources utilization, and costs were assessed, along with remitter and responder rates. RESULTS: A total of 4860 records were analyzed. Discontinuation was lower with brand-name than with generic in NP (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.70 [95% CI: 0.58-0.85], p < 0.001) and GAD patients (HR: 0.63 [0.45-0.84], p < 0.001). Adjusted mean total costs were lower with brand-name: €1500 [1428-1573] vs. €2003 [1864-2143] in NP and €1528 [1322-1734] vs. €2150 [1845-2454] in GAD (both p < 0.001). More patients were remitters/ responders with brand-name in NP (55.0% vs. 46.7% and 59.2% vs. 48.4%, respectively; p < 0.001) and GAD (58.6% vs. 48.7% and 64.6% vs. 47.2%, respectively; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: As a consequence of higher persistence in routine practice, patients who first started therapy with pregabalin brand-name versus generic showed better pain or anxiety outcomes at a lower cost to payers in Spain.

Cost of treating peripheral neuropathic pain with pregabalin or gabapentin at therapeutic doses in routine practice.

AIM: To analyze the cost of peripheral neuropathic pain (PNP) treatment with pregabalin or gabapentin at therapeutic doses in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Analysis of a retrospective, observational study of electronic medical records of patients treated for PNP with therapeutic doses of pregabalin or gabapentin, with 2 years' follow-up, considering PNP type, comorbidities, concomitant analgesia and resource use. RESULTS: The weighted total average cost/patient was lower for pregabalin than gabapentin (€2464 [2197-2730] vs €3142 [2670-3614]; p = 0.014) due to significantly lower both healthcare and non-healthcare costs. This is explained by a significantly lower use of concomitant analgesia, fewer primary care visits and fewer days of sick leave. CONCLUSION: At therapeutic doses, pregabalin was found to have lower healthcare and non-healthcare costs than gabapentin in routine practice.

Comorbilidad, medicación concomitante, uso de recursos y costes sanitarios asociados a los pacientes portadores del virus de la hepatitis C crónica en España / Comorbidity, concomitant medication, use of resources and healthcare costs associated with chronic hepatitis C virus carriers in Spain

OBJETIVOS: Evaluar la comorbilidad, los medicamentos concomitantes, el uso de los recursos y los costes sanitarios asociados a los pacientes portadores del virus de la hepatitis C crónica en población española. PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo, observacional, no intervencionista. Se incluyeron pacientes ≥ 18 años, que demandaron atención durante los años 2010-2013. Se dividieron en 2 grupos en función de la presencia/ausencia de cirrosis hepática. El período de seguimiento fue de 12 meses. Las principales mediciones fueron: comorbilidad general (banda de utilización de recursos) y específica, medicamentos concomitantes, uso de recursos y costes sanitarios. El análisis estadístico fue realizado utilizando modelos de regresión y ANCOVA, p < 0,05. RESULTADOS: Se seleccionaron 1.055 pacientes con una edad media de 57,9 años, y el 55,5% eran varones. El 43,5% de los pacientes presentaron un grado de comorbilidad moderado (banda de utilización de recursos). El tiempo medio desde el diagnóstico fue de 18,1 años y el 7,5% de los pacientes fallecieron durante el período de seguimiento. Las comorbilidades más frecuentes fueron: dislipidemia (40,3%), hipertensión (40,1%) y dolor generalizado (38,1%). La cirrosis se asoció con los eventos cardiovasculares (OR 3,8), los fallos orgánicos (OR 2,2), el alcoholismo (OR 2,1), la diabetes (OR 1,2) y la edad (OR 1,2); p < 0,05. Los medicamentos más utilizados fueron antiinfecciosos (67,8%) y fármacos para el sistema nervioso (66,8%). El coste total medio por paciente fue de 3.198euros (71,5% costes sanitarios, 28,5% costes indirectos/no sanitarios). En el modelo corregido, el coste total por paciente-año fue de 2.211 euros sin cirrosis y de 7.641 euros con cirrosis; p < 0,001. CONCLUSIONES: Los pacientes con virus de la hepatitis C crónica se asocian a una elevada comorbilidad y uso de medicación concomitante, especialmente en los sujetos con cirrosis hepática. La infección por virus de la hepatitis C crónica supone una importante carga económica para el Sistema Nacional de Salud

OBJECTIVES: To assess the comorbidity, concomitant medications, healthcare resource use and healthcare costs of chronic hepatitis C virus patients in the Spanish population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective, observational, non-interventional study. Patients included were ≥ 18 years of age who accessed medical care between 2010-2013. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of liver cirrhosis. The follow-up period was 12 months. Main assessment criteria included general comorbidity level (determined by the resource utilisation band score) and prevalence of specific comorbidities, concomitant medications, healthcare resource use and healthcare costs. Statistical analysis was performed using regression models and ANCOVA, P < .05. RESULTS: One thousand fifty-five patients were enrolled, the mean age was 57.9 years and 55.5% were male. A percentage of 43.5 of patients had a moderate level of comorbidity according to the resource utilisation band score. The mean time from diagnosis was 18.1 years and 7.5% of the patients died during the follow-up period. The most common comorbidities were dyslipidaemia (40.3%), hypertension (40.1%) and generalised pain (38.1%). Cirrhosis was associated with cardiovascular events (OR 3.8), organ failures (OR 2.2), alcoholism (OR 2.1), diabetes (OR 1.2) and age (OR 1.2); P < .05. The most commonly used medications were anti-infectives (67.8%) and nervous system medications (66.8%). The mean total cost per patient was 3,198 euros (71.5% healthcare costs, 28.5% indirect/non-healthcare costs). In the corrected model, the total costs per patient-year were 2,211 euros for those without cirrhosis and 7,641 euros for patients with cirrhosis; P < .001. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic hepatitis C virus patients are associated with a high level of comorbidity and the use of concomitant medications, especially in patients with liver cirrhosis. Chronic hepatitis C virus infection represents a substantial economic burden on the Spanish National Health System

Comorbidity, concomitant medication, use of resources and healthcare costs associated with chronic hepatitis C virus carriers in Spain. / Comorbilidad, medicación concomitante, uso de recursos y costes sanitarios asociados a los pacientes portadores del virus de la hepatitis C crónica en España.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the comorbidity, concomitant medications, healthcare resource use and healthcare costs of chronic hepatitis C virus patients in the Spanish population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective, observational, non-interventional study. Patients included were≥18 years of age who accessed medical care between 2010-2013. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of liver cirrhosis. The follow-up period was 12 months. Main assessment criteria included general comorbidity level (determined by the resource utilisation band score) and prevalence of specific comorbidities, concomitant medications, healthcare resource use and healthcare costs. Statistical analysis was performed using regression models and ANCOVA, P<.05. RESULTS: One thousand fifty-five patients were enrolled, the mean age was 57.9 years and 55.5% were male. A percentage of 43.5 of patients had a moderate level of comorbidity according to the resource utilisation band score. The mean time from diagnosis was 18.1 years and 7.5% of the patients died during the follow-up period. The most common comorbidities were dyslipidaemia (40.3%), hypertension (40.1%) and generalised pain (38.1%). Cirrhosis was associated with cardiovascular events (OR 3.8), organ failures (OR 2.2), alcoholism (OR 2.1), diabetes (OR 1.2) and age (OR 1.2); P<.05. The most commonly used medications were anti-infectives (67.8%) and nervous system medications (66.8%). The mean total cost per patient was 3,198€ (71.5% healthcare costs, 28.5% indirect/non-healthcare costs). In the corrected model, the total costs per patient-year were 2,211€ for those without cirrhosis and 7,641€ for patients with cirrhosis; P<.001. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic hepatitis C virus patients are associated with a high level of comorbidity and the use of concomitant medications, especially in patients with liver cirrhosis. Chronic hepatitis C virus infection represents a substantial economic burden on the Spanish National Health System.

Impact on healthcare resource utilization of multiple sclerosis in Spain.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disease with a high socioeconomic impact. The aim of this study was to assess healthcare resources utilization and costs in a sample of patients with MS. METHODS: A retrospective, cohort study was conducted using electronic medical records from 19 primary care centres in Asturias and Catalonia, Spain. Adult patients diagnosed with MS were distributed into two groups according to the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score: 0-3.5 (no-moderate disability) and 4-9.5 (severe disability). Healthcare (direct cost) and non-healthcare costs (work productivity losses) were analysed. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used for correction, p < 0.05. A multiple regression model was performed to obtain the variables associated with costs. RESULTS: A total of 222 patients were analyzed; mean (SD) age: 45.5 (12.5) years, 64.4% female, and 62.2% presented a diagnosis of relapsing-remitting MS. Median EDSS score was 2.5, with 68.5% of the patients with no to moderate disability. The mean annual cost per MS patient was €25,103. For no-moderate and severe disability, the ANCOVA-adjusted mean annual cost was €23,157 and €29,242, respectively (p = 0.013). Direct costs and MS disease-modifying therapy accounted for 39.4% and 31.7% of the total costs, respectively. The total costs were associated with number of relapses (ß = 0.135, p = 0.001), time since diagnosis (ß = 0.281, p = 0.023), and age (ß = 0.198, p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple sclerosis imposes a substantial economic burden on the Spanish National Health System, patients and society as a whole. Costs significantly correlated with disease progression.

Comorbidity and metabolic syndrome in patients with multiple sclerosis from Asturias and Catalonia, Spain.

BACKGROUND: The impact of comorbidity on multiple sclerosis (MS) is a new area of interest. Limited data on the risk factors of metabolic syndrome (MetS) is currently available. The aim of this study was to estimate the presence of comorbid conditions and MetS in a sample of adult patients with MS. METHODS: A retrospective, cohort study was conducted using electronic medical records from 19 primary care centres in Catalonia and Asturias, Spain. The number of chronic diseases (diagnoses), the Charlson Comorbidity Index and the individual Case-mix Index were used to assess general comorbidity variables. MetS was defined using the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III. Patients were distributed into two groups according to the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score: 0-3.5 and 4-10. RESULTS: A total of 222 patients were studied (mean age = 45.5 (SD 12.5) years, 64.4% were female and 62.2% presented a diagnosis of relapsing-remitting MS). Mean EDSS score was 3.2 (SD 2.0). Depression (32.4%), dyslipidaemia (31.1%), hypertension (23.0%) and obesity (22.5%) were the most common comorbidities. Overall MetS prevalence was 31.1% (95% CI: 25.0-37.2%). Patients with an EDSS ≥ 4.0 showed a significantly higher number of comorbidities (OR=2.2; 95% CI: 1.7-3.0; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: MS patients had a high prevalence of MetS. Screening for comorbidity should be part of standard MS care. Further studies are necessary to confirm this association and the underlying mechanisms of MS and its comorbidities.

Cost of treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain with pregabalin or gabapentin in routine clinical practice: impact of their loss of exclusivity.

To analyze the effect of loss of exclusivity of data on the cost of treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain (PNP) with pregabalin or gabapentin in routine clinical practice. A retrospective observational study, with electronic medical records for patients enrolled at primary care centers managed by the health care provider Badalona Serveis Assistencials, who initiated treatment of PNP with pregabalin or gabapentin. The analysis used drugs and resources prices for year 2015. The 1163 electronic medical records (pregabalin; N = 764, gabapentin; N = 399) for patients (62.2% women) with a mean (standard deviation) age of 59.2 (14.7) years were analyzed. Treatment duration was slightly shorter with pregabalin than with gabapentin (5.2 vs 5.5 months; P = 0.124), with mean doses of 227.4 (178.6) mg and 900.0 (443.4) mg, respectively. The average study drug cost per patient was higher for pregabalin than for gabapentin; €214.6 (206.3) vs €157.4 (181.9), P < 0.001, although the cost of concomitant analgesic medication was lower; €176.5 (271.8) vs €306.7 (529.2), P < 0.001. The adjusted average total cost per patient was lower in those treated with pregabalin than in those treated with gabapentin; €2,413 (2119-2708) vs €3201 (2806-3.597); P = 0.002, owing to significantly lower health care costs; €1307 (1247-1367) vs €1538 (1458-1618), P < 0.001, and also non-health care costs; €1106 (819-1393) vs €1663 (1279-2048), P = 0.023, that was caused by a significantly lower use of concomitant medication, fewer medical visits to primary care, and fewer days of sick leave. After loss of exclusivity of both drugs, pregabalin continued to show lower health care and non-health care costs than gabapentin in the treatment of PNP in routine clinical practice.

Consumo de recursos sanitarios y costes asociados al inicio del tratamiento con fármacos inyectables en pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 / Use of healthcare resources and costs associated to the start of treatment with injectable drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Objetivos: El objetivo principal fue evaluar el uso de recursos y costes de los pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 que inician tratamiento con insulina o análogos del receptor de GLP-1 (AR GLP-1) inyectables en un ámbito poblacional español. Por otro lado, se determinó la adherencia y persistencia al tratamiento en ambos grupos de tratamiento. Pacientes y métodos: Diseño observacional, no-intervencionista, de carácter retrospectivo. Se incluyeron pacientes ≥20 años que iniciaron tratamiento con insulina o AR GLP-1 durante 2010-2012. Se determinó el consumo de recursos sanitarios relacionados con la actividad asistencial (visitas médicas, días de hospitalización, visitas a urgencias, solicitudes diagnósticas o terapéuticas, medicación) para evaluar el coste sanitario en estos 2 grupos de pacientes. Se recogió información clínica como índice de masa corporal (kg/m2) control metabólico (HbA1c), adherencia, persistencia y complicaciones (hipoglucemias y eventos cardiovasculares). El seguimiento se realizó durante 12 meses. Solo se tuvo en cuenta los costes sanitarios directos. Resultados: Se reclutaron 1.301 pacientes, con una edad media de 67,6 años, el 51,6% varones. El 71,9% en tratamiento con insulina y el 28,1% con AR GLP-1. Al año de seguimiento los pacientes tratados con AR GLP-1 tuvieron menos consultas a atención primaria (8 vs 11; p < 0,001), a especializada (1,0 vs 1,8; p < 0,001), hospitalizaciones (0,3 vs 0,7; p = 0,030) y visitas a urgencias (0,8 vs 1,6; p < 0,001). Los pacientes tratados con GLP-1 mostraron una mayor adherencia (88,1% vs 82,7%; p < 0,001), persistencia (62,0% vs 55,9%; p=0,046) y menor proporción de hipoglucemias (13,4% vs 18,7%; p = 0,022) con similar control metabólico (HbA1c: 7,2% vs 7,4%; p = 0,049), índice de masa corporal (29,1 vs 30,9kg/m2) y tasa de eventos cardiovasculares (9,1% vs 11,5%; p = 0,330), respectivamente. El promedio/unitario de los costes sanitarios directos corregidos fue de 1.787€ vs 2.005€; p=0,046. Conclusiones: Los pacientes en tratamiento con AR GLP-1 ocasionaron menores costes sanitarios directos para el Sistema Nacional de Salud que los pacientes en tratamiento con insulinas. Los resultados obtenidos podrían explicarse por una mayor adherencia al tratamiento y menores tasas de hipoglucemias en los pacientes tratados con AR GLP-1. Se necesitan más estudios para poder confirmar estas posibles razones (AU)

Objectives: The main objective was to assess resource use and costs of starting treatment with insulin or injectable GLP-1 receptor analogues (GLP-1 RAs) in a Spanish population of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Treatment adherence and persistence were also determined for both treatment groups. Patients and methods: A retrospective, non-interventional, observational study was conducted. Patients aged ≥20 years who started treatment with insulin or GLP-1 RAs in the 2010-2012 period were recruited. Use of healthcare resources was estimated to evaluate healthcare costs in these two groups of patients (medical visits, hospital stay, emergency visits, diagnostic or treatment requests, medication). Clinical information including body mass index (BMI, kg/m2), metabolic control (HbA1c), adherence, persistence, and complications (hypoglycemia, and cardiovascular events (CVE) was collected. The follow-up period was 12 months. Only direct healthcare costs were considered. Results: A total of 1301 patients with a mean age of 67.6 years (51.6% males) were recruited. Of these, 71.9% and 28.1% were on treatment with insulin and GLP-1 RA respectively. After one year of follow-up, patients treated with GLP-1 RAs were found less visits to primary care (8 vs. 11; P<.001) and specialized care (1.0 vs. 1.8; P<.001), hospital stays (0.3 vs. 0.7; P=.030) and less visits to the emergency room (0.8 vs. 1.6; P<.001). Patients treated with GLP-1 showed greater adherence (88.1% vs. 82.7%; P<.001) and persistence (62.0% vs. 55.9%; P=.046), and had less hypoglycemia episodes (13.4% vs. 18.7%; P=.022), with similar metabolic control (HbA1c: 7.2% vs. 7.4%; P=.049), BMI (29.1 vs. 30.9kg/m2), and CVE rate (9.1% vs. 11.5%; P=.330) respectively. The mean corrected direct healthcare cost per patient was €1787 vs. €2005 (P=.046.) Conclusions: Patients treated with GLP-1 RAs caused lower direct healthcare costs for the National Health System than patients treated with insulin. The results may be explained by greater treatment adherence and lower hypoglycemia rates in patients treated with GLP-1 RAs. Additional studies are needed to confirm these possibilities (AU)

Use of healthcare resources and costs associated to the start of treatment with injectable drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. / Consumo de recursos sanitarios y costes asociados al inicio del tratamiento con fármacos inyectables en pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2.

OBJECTIVES: The main objective was to assess resource use and costs of starting treatment with insulin or injectable GLP-1 receptor analogues (GLP-1 RAs) in a Spanish population of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Treatment adherence and persistence were also determined for both treatment groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective, non-interventional, observational study was conducted. Patients aged ≥20 years who started treatment with insulin or GLP-1 RAs in the 2010-2012 period were recruited. Use of healthcare resources was estimated to evaluate healthcare costs in these two groups of patients (medical visits, hospital stay, emergency visits, diagnostic or treatment requests, medication). Clinical information including body mass index (BMI, kg/m2), metabolic control (HbA1c), adherence, persistence, and complications (hypoglycemia, and cardiovascular events (CVE) was collected. The follow-up period was 12 months. Only direct healthcare costs were considered. RESULTS: A total of 1301 patients with a mean age of 67.6 years (51.6% males) were recruited. Of these, 71.9% and 28.1% were on treatment with insulin and GLP-1 RA respectively. After one year of follow-up, patients treated with GLP-1 RAs were found less visits to primary care (8 vs. 11; P<.001) and specialized care (1.0 vs. 1.8; P<.001), hospital stays (0.3 vs. 0.7; P=.030) and less visits to the emergency room (0.8 vs. 1.6; P<.001). Patients treated with GLP-1 showed greater adherence (88.1% vs. 82.7%; P<.001) and persistence (62.0% vs. 55.9%; P=.046), and had less hypoglycemia episodes (13.4% vs. 18.7%; P=.022), with similar metabolic control (HbA1c: 7.2% vs. 7.4%; P=.049), BMI (29.1 vs. 30.9kg/m2), and CVE rate (9.1% vs. 11.5%; P=.330) respectively. The mean corrected direct healthcare cost per patient was €1787 vs. €2005 (P=.046.) CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with GLP-1 RAs caused lower direct healthcare costs for the National Health System than patients treated with insulin. The results may be explained by greater treatment adherence and lower hypoglycemia rates in patients treated with GLP-1 RAs. Additional studies are needed to confirm these possibilities.

[Clinical characteristics and treatment response in adult patients with non-Hodgkin's chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)]. / Características clínicas y respuesta al tratamiento de pacientes adultos con leucemia linfática crónica (LLC) y linfoma no Hodgkin (LNH).

OBJECTIVE: To determine comorbidities, clinical characteristics, and treatment response in adult patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and follicular lymphoma (FL). METHODS: The design was observational from reviewing the medical records of patients seen in outpatient and inpatient settings. It included ≥50 subjects who demanded attention during the period 2008-2012 and that met specific inclusion/exclusion criteria. The main measures were: comorbidity (population group), clinical stage, patient treatment, response to treatment, overall survival, progression-free survival, and mortality. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: p<0.05. RESULTS: 270 patients (CLL=90, DLBCL=81, FL=99) were recruited, with a mean age of 72.5, 65.5, and 62.4 years, respectively. These groups of neoplasms, compared with the general population, showed a higher percentage of men (60.0, 56.8 and 52.6 vs. 46.2%) and morbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index: 1.6, 1.5, 1.4 vs. 0.4, respectively; p<0.05). The administration of chemotherapy treatment was 28.9 vs. 86.4 and 90.9%, respectively (p<0.001). Overall survival at five years was 84.4, 45.0 and 68.5%, respectively (p=0.027), while mortality rates were 17.0 vs. 35.3 and 20.6%, respectively (p=0.041). Compared with other treatments, with administered rituximab the median progression-free survival was 6.8 vs. 4.2 years (p<0.001). These differences were maintained for the three neoplasms. CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidity associated with hematological malignancies is high. The chronic lymphocytic leukemia group showed increased survival with lower mortality rate. Rituximab showed a higher progression-free survival in these neoplasms.

Use of antidepressants in the treatment of major depressive disorder in primary care during a period of economic crisis.

OBJECTIVE: To describe antidepressant (AD) use in the treatment of major depressive disorder during a period of economic crisis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational study using population-based databases. Two periods were considered: 1) 2008-2009, precrisis, and 2) 2012-2013, economic crisis. Certain inclusion/exclusion criteria were taken into account for the study (initiation of AD treatment). Patients were followed up for 12 months. The main measures were use (defined daily doses), epidemiologic measures, strategies used and treatment persistence, referrals, and use of resources. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05. RESULTS: In the precrisis period, 3,662 patients were enrolled, and 5,722 were enrolled in the period of economic crisis. Average age was 58.8 years and 65.4% were women. Comparing the two periods, major depressive disorder prevalence was 5.4% vs 8.1%, P<0.001. During the period of economic crisis, AD use rose by 35.2% and drug expenditures decreased by 38.7%. Defined daily dose per patient per day was 10.0 mg vs 13.5 mg, respectively, P<0.001. At 12-month follow-up, the majority of patients (60.8%) discontinued the treatment or continued on the same medication as before, and in 23.3% a change of AD was made. CONCLUSION: Primary health care professionals are highly involved in the management of the illness; in addition, during the period of economic crisis, patients with major depressive disorder showed higher rates of prevalence of the illness, with increased use of AD drugs.

Impact of Loss of Work Productivity in Patients with Overactive Bladder Treated with Antimuscarinics in Spain: Study in Routine Clinical Practice Conditions.

BACKGROUND: Overactive bladder (OAB) is a syndrome characterized by presenting symptoms of urgency, with or without urge incontinence, and normally accompanied by day and night frequency. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of lost work productivity [number of days of sick leave] in patients treated with fesoterodine versus tolterodine and solifenacin to treat OAB in Spain. METHODS: A retrospective, observational study was carried out using the records (digital databases) of actively working patients (2008-2013). The study population comprised of patients from two autonomous communities; 31 primary care centres agreed to participate. Patients who began first treatment with antimuscarinics (fesoterodine, solifenacin or tolterodine) and who met certain inclusion/exclusion criteria were included in the study. Follow-up lasted for 1 year. The main outcome measures were comorbidity, medication possession ratio (MPR), treatment persistence, and number of days of sick leave and associated costs. Indirect costs were considered to be those related to lost work productivity (number of days of sick leave, exclusively), (1) due to OAB and (2) overall total. The cost was expressed as the average cost per patient (cost/unit). Multivariate analyses (Cox, ANCOVA) were used to correct the models. RESULTS: A total of 3094 patients were recruited into the study; 43.0 % were treated with solifenacin, 29.2 % with tolterodine, and 27.8 % with fesoterodine. The average age of patients was 54 years (standard deviation 9.2), and 62.2 % were women. The comparison of fesoterodine versus solifenacin and tolterodine showed a higher MPR (90.0 vs. 87.0 and 86.1 %, respectively), higher treatment persistence (40.2 vs. 34.7 and 33.6 %), lower use of sick leave (22.8 vs. 52.9 and 36.7 %), total number of days of sick leave (5.1 vs. 9.7 and 9.3 days) and costs corrected for covariates (€371 vs. €703 and €683); p < 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the possible limitations of this study, active patients who began treatment with fesoterodine to treat OAB (compared with solifenacin or tolterodine) had fewer days of sick leave, resulting in lower costs due to lost productivity.

Comparative effectiveness and costs of generic and brand-name gabapentin and venlafaxine in patients with neuropathic pain or generalized anxiety disorder in Spain.

OBJECTIVE: To explore adherence/persistence with generic gabapentin/venlafaxine versus brand-name gabapentin/venlafaxine (Neurontin(®)/Vandral(®)) in peripheral neuropathic pain (pNP) or generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), respectively, and whether it is translated into different costs and patient outcomes in routine medical practice. METHODS: A retrospective, new-user cohort study was designed. Electronic medical records (EMR) of patients included in the health plan of Badalona Serveis Assistencials SA, Barcelona, Spain were exhaustively extracted for analysis. Participants were beneficiaries aged 18+ years, followed between 2008 and 2012, with a pNP/GAD International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code, who initiated treatment with generic or brand-name gabapentin or venlafaxine. Assessments included 1-year treatment persistence and adherence (medication possession ratio), health care costs, and reduction in severity of pain and anxiety symptoms. RESULTS: A total of 2,210 EMR were analyzed; 1,369 on gabapentin (brand 400; generic 969) and 841 on venlafaxine (brand 370 and generic 471). Brand-name gabapentin and venlafaxine were both significantly associated with longer persistence than generic: 7.3 versus 6.3 months, P<0.001; and 8.8 versus 8.1 months, P<0.05, respectively. Brand-name was associated with higher adherence: 86.5% versus 81.3%, P<0.001; and 82.1% versus 79.0%, P<0.05, respectively. Adjusted average costs were higher with generic compared with brand: €1,277 versus €1,057 (difference of €220 per patient; P<0.001) for gabapentin; and €1,110 versus €928 (difference of €182 per patient; P=0.020) for venlafaxine, both because of more use of medical visits and concomitant medication. Compared with generic, brand-name was associated with higher reduction in pain (7.8%; P<0.001) and anxiety (13.2%; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients initiating brand-name gabapentin or venlafaxine were more likely to adhere and persist on treatment of pNP or GAD, have lower health care costs, and show further reduction of pain and anxiety symptoms than with generic drugs in routine medical practice.